Movies »To Die For

to die forSometimes a rainy Sunday is perfect for revisiting favorite movies, and Gus Van Sant's black comedic true crime satire, To Die For is definitely a favorite of mine. The cast is at their peak. Matt Dillon is radiantly slovenly and Nicole Kidman still looks like a blooming real human being and, in a career of very few bright spots performance-wise, she's brutally excellent as a psychopath. She is the blond, perfectly coiffed personification of a certain fame seeking, ambitious, and broken part of our culture. Ileana Douglas also shines and look out for cameos by David Cronenberg and the films screenwriter, Buck Henry.

While the film satirizes the searing ambition that can lead people to kill, and points out our insatiable lust for the torrid tabloid tales that follow, it's also one of the best examples of true crime entertainment. Any fan of Joaquin Phoenix would also agree that it's one of the steamiest as well. (Which is a little creepy considering the story's of a teenager seduced into murder by a grown woman.)

Here, as the seduced teenage burnout, Phoenix is pretty much the embodiment of my teenage desires: he's off-kilteredly handsome, blindly lustful, denim and leather dirty, very dumb and a little bit sad. One can't help but feel a pang of sympathy for the kid as he sits in a junk yard looking off in the distance, walleyed and slack jawed and calls his polka dot and manicured mistress “clean” with longing.

The film is based on the novel To Die For, which was itself inspired by the true, sordid, tabloid sensation crime of one Pam Smart. Also a call in show called Metal Madness), Pamela also seduced a boy (Billy Flynn) and convinced he and his friends to kill her husband. She is currently serving a life sentence without the possibility of parole and Flynn, having served more of his life in prison that outside, recently asked for (and was denied) a reduced sentence.

See more: Movies


Be the first to leave a comment →
Posted on May 4, 2009

Movies »All the President’s Men

all the presidents menMaking All the President's Men into a taut, suspenseful, and intelligent political drama was no small feat for director Alan J Pakula (who proved to be an expert in the poli-thriller genre with the equally great Parallax View) considering that everyone knows how the story ends and that most of the two hour plus running time consists of Robert Redford and Dustin Hoffman making phone calls, taking notes, running around and trying desperately to extract information from unwilling sources.

I saw this movie when I was a kid and learned what this whole 'Watergate' thing I'd heard so much about actually was. I also grew a fond of corduroy suits thanks to the utterly charming (as usual) Robert Redford, who has the hair of a god. Thanks to other young viewers, it's since become known as “the movie that launched a thousand journalism careers” with its accurate and respectful depiction of all the hard work that goes into revealing the truth.

Of course, since the films release in 1976, the entire world of traditional newspaper journalism has been pushed to the brink of obsolescence by the easy access to information offered by the internet; several major publications have already folded (recently my homestate's Rocky Mountain News). The film is nostalgic, then about the days when newspaper journalism was still considered vitally important and could actually change the world.

The informant known as Deep Throat, played by a sinisterly smokey Hal Holbrook in the film, has since been revealed to have been Mark Felt, the FBI's number two man.

All the President's Men is currently available for instant viewing on Netflix.

See more: Movies


Be the first to leave a comment →
Posted on April 27, 2009

Movies »Wall-E

wall e? Once again Pixar has surprised and amazed me. While I have to admit that my first reaction to advertisements for Wall-E wasn't one of wonder (I actually thought it might be a bit too precious and contrived), in a way I'm glad that the animation powerhouse keeps proving me to be too cranky and cynical because let me tell you, this thing is fantastic and it nearly brought myself and Jim (who never cries) to tears.

Andrew Stanton, John Lasseter and team managed to make magic from the simplest ingredients: a desolate landscape that is an environmentalist's worst nightmare is rendered so exquisitely that you're left marveling at dust and trash; a cockroach, universally rather despised, becomes an adorable and loyal companion.

The warnings of impending environmental collapse (including morbid obesity, laziness and human gluttony destroying the earth) are harsh and direct, I'm hard pressed to think of another recent mainstream movie so clear in its message, especially a children's film. It's quite an achievement in this testy time to be so political without alienating audiences and coming off preachy.

I think the film manages this feat by instilling so much humanity in its nonhuman stars. Wall-E and Eve, just scraps of metal and computer chips, can make you laugh, cry and want to be a better person – pretty powerful stuff for a cartoon.

See more: Movies


Be the first to leave a comment →
Posted on April 20, 2009

Movies »Bad Ronald

Bad Ronald is a 1974 made-for-TV-movie that derives at least some of its allure from the mere fact that it's so hard to find (although it can be seen on You Tube). Airing two years before VHS was unleashed on the US, Bad Ronald was bound to become a forgotten eerie relic of the past. The fact that my favorite writer, science fiction master Jack Vance, wrote the novel on which it was based (the only one of his works ever adapted for the screen) piqued my interest even more and I just had to get a copy from J4HI.

The movie, depending on your point of view, either suffers from or is enhanced by the venerable yet constrictive format of the made-for-TV-movie. The melodramatic music, the odd pacing, and the considerably watered down plot lines that (reportedly) are far less brutal than the original source material (I say reportedly because the book is out of print and first editions are out of my price range) can make for pretty difficult viewing for those with limited patience for the retro verging on cheesy. I myself am not such a person, I find low production values can be an asset – particularly when it comes to thrillers – and once I adjusted to the grainy transfer and flat acting style, I discovered the qualities of this strange and chilling little gem.

Ronald is a kid with an oddly strong bond with his possessive mom (Kim Hunter) who accidentally gets involved in some very bad business. As a result, mother convinces Ronald to stay hidden in a bathroom (which they board up) until all interest in the incident goes away. He essentially becomes a prisoner of his mother's in his own house until she goes off and die on him. A family of young, nubile girls moves in (a youngish, nubilish Dabney Coleman plays their father) and Ronald, who's basically living in the walls, becomes crazier and more like an outsider artist with each passing day as he spies on the new family and develops a psychotic fantasy world.

The film's tag-line puts it best, describing Ronald as “a ghost who isn't dead” haunting the house until he finally reveals himself to the frightened teens. It's the kind of movie that manages to inflame some fundamental fears and I imagine it was deeply etched in the minds (and nightmares) of the children who watched it when it originally aired.

Funnily enough, star Scott Jacoby seems so familiar not just because he resembles a neighbor of mine plus Matthew Modine, but because he played a recurring role as Dorothy's son on the Golden Girls.

See more: Movies


Be the first to leave a comment →
Posted on April 13, 2009

Movies »The Brood

the broodIt's no big surprise to learn that David Cronenberg wrote The Brood during a particularly bitter custody battle. The plot deals with a level-headed dad (played by Art Hindle, who you may recognize from the first Brix Pick Movie recommendation ever, Black Christmas) with great hair, a great winter jacket and Ted Bundy type looks who unwittingly battles the rage incarnate of his crazy ex-wife, a woman who seems wants nothing more than to make him suffer and take his young daughter away.

Like most Cronenberg films, real life pain and suffering, like the bitterness and hatred that can accompany a messy divorce, or the paranoia that can sometimes come with single parenthood, manifest in the stuff of nightmares. You've come to expect some gross out stuff from the Canadian, and he doesn't disappoint in The Brood. Initial audiences flipped out during one scene in particular that involves blood and tongue-grooming.

But the underlying horror is far more effective than simple shock value; it's deeply chilling movie because it takes something generally wholesome and comforting, family, and turns it on its ear. Violence isn't caused by some random psychopath but by mothers, children, doctors and even your own body. It's a great, discomforting movie of, but it does lag in between moments of complete visual terror.

Manly Oliver Reed is lion-like as an experimental psychiatrist who practices (the very Cronenberg sounding) “Psycho Plasmics” in a remote, very 70's, all wood and angles retreat and actress Samantha Eggar plays the crazy woman quite well. Even minor characters, like a neurotic former patient who has complaints (and a huge lymphomic neck) against the doctor is played wonderfully, with real humanity, by Croneberg regular Robert A Silverman.

While The Brood never reaches the peaks of the director's 1983 masterpiece, Videodrome, it's a quieter movie punctuated by extremely effective jolts of violence and tension.

See more: Movies


Be the first to leave a comment →
Posted on April 6, 2009

Movies »Airborne

airborne movieAirborne has been a personal guilty pleasure of mine since my early college years, back when I met like-minded people who were totally uncritical of any film branded independent, who introduced me to the strange new world of Ska music, and who could recall the glories of Swan's Crossing with the same affection I did.

As a matter of fact, Shane McDermott – who played Garrett Booth, star-crossed lover of then dark haired Sarah Michelle Gellar in that oft-mentioned Brix Pick – takes the lead role of Mitchell Goosen in this movie, which is wholly acted by no one particularly good looking. Don't get me wrong, I love the kid, but I'd only cast him as a date rapist in a Lifetime movie titled something like, “If She Knew What She Wanted” (that's officially my idea now, so I don't want to see you all shopping scripts without due credit).

But don't fret if you've never seen the show, a plethora of non-Swan's Crossing talents abounds as well. Jack Black proves that he wasn't always just some cool dude that stumbled into comedic success as he hones his signature spazzing out before your very eyes and hams up lines like, “I like Nintendo and I like Nintendo” – oh, and he gets a tree in the nards. I'm sure I've mentioned this before, but my friend Brandon can be seen in the double date turned disaster scene – he's the one wearing a patchwork denim jacket and staring straight into the camera.

Stewart Copeland – yes, that Stewart Copeland – is behind the music, though I can't imagine he was 100% responsible for the B-grade Babyface-type song that includes the lyrics, “I'll pick you up in my per-son-al limonsine!” which plays during a rollerblading greenhouse scene… and I know he wasn't behind Right Said Fred's 'I'm Too Sexy' montage of Seth Green trying on various outfits for a date, looking, I'm sad to say, a lot like a ventriloquist's dummy in all of them. Yep, Seth Green is here too, sporting a haircut and circular rose-tinted glasses that make him look like a lesbian friend on Ann Magnuson's, circa 1989. As always, he's totally boss as a goof ball best buddy.

The plot's a familiar one and we've all been there: you're a Ghandi-loving California surfer who tells his rollerblades 'gracias' at the end of the day and you come home to find your parents packed off to Australia forcing you to head to freezing Cincinnati, a sad, sad place where no one understands your enlightened Zen attitude and everyone plays hockey.

Ok, so maybe it didn't happen to you – but it happened to me… vicariously. In eighth grade we got our very own Mitch Goosen when Ryan Lokken, a?blonde California surfer dude enrolled in our class and (I swear) handed out wallet-sized portraits of his surf crew to all the ladies. But, unlike the Ohian high school in Airborne, we didn't have any forty-year-old bullies out for Ryan's blood.

But if your school did have bullies, cast as forty year olds or not, you might savor the moment when Mitch tells his, “I could give two left testicles about you, your school or you hockey game!” There's also some sweet afternoon movie romance with tapered jean dream named Nikki who, while only being Sarah Powell hot (from Charles in Charge), still manages to look pretty great next to the other slags.

It's a rare and wholesome treat (and, I might add, a nice companion piece to former guilty pleasure Heavyweights), the kind of movie where the big finale takes place at dun, dun, dun… The Devil's Backbone! “Only the most dangerous hill in the whole town!”

By the way,?watch it now on Netflix on demand because the DVD, according to super irate Amazon customers, is only available in German.

See more: Movies


Be the first to leave a comment →
Posted on March 30, 2009

Movies »Happy-Go-Lucky

happy go luckydirected by Mike Leigh (2008)

Admiration isn’t a strong enough word to describe how I feel about Mike Leigh and his magical films of the mundane. Life is Sweet, Grown Ups, Naked, Topsy Turvy, and the Short and Curlies all make my list of all-time favorite movies; and while I freely admit that I tend to shy away from his more depressing projects (I had to stop All or Nothing about 20 minutes in and have yet to see Vera Drake), his grace, empathy and subtle comedic touch is truly unrivaled. So I was understandably thrilled when I first heard about his latest film, Happy-Go-Lucky, the story of an unusually optimistic young woman who meets a racist driving instructor.

Leigh essentially redefines the chick flick by totally rethinking all the boring Hollywood clich?s. Instead of a Sandy Bullock clone of a Sandy Bullock character who’s one dimensionally “quirky”, quietly lonely beneath her semi-eccentric (let’s just call it brassy) shell, saddled with a wise-cracking best friend and whose life can only become actualized by a man, Sally Hawkins plays Poppy as a lovable goofball who is happy just living her life – teaching kids, taking classes, partying with her best friends – and she doesn’t need a boyfriend to complete her. Poppy’s contentment is especially baffling and hard to deal with for the people she encounters who are not satisfied with their own lives; one character can’t believe that true happiness can be attained without a husband and a mortgage, another is actually offended by her ready acceptance of the world as a chaotic, messy place.

Hawkins has won numerous awards and considerable accolades for her brilliant performance, which is far more complex than it may initially sound – sure, Poppy is tirelessly optimistic, but she’s not in any way push-able around or na?ve. Equally impressive is Eddie Marsen‘s amazing turn as Scott, the driving instructor whose small, paranoid, misogynistic and racist world Poppy (unintentionally) rocks to its core.

While it’s fair to warn that, compared to the hysteric dramatics of most contemporary rom coms, not a whole lot happens in this film (Poppy hurts her back and visits a chiropractor, she browses a book store, she grabs a beer with a friend, etc?, it’s a testament to everyone involved that by the time this engaging, quiet movie is through, it has become thoroughly moving and you end up empathizing with the most vile of people. By its conclusion, the film has actually forced the audience to see the world through Poppy’s compassionate eyes, if only for a moment, which makes for a really quite stunning movie going experience.

What can I say, I just loved this movie, absolutely loved it! Enraha!

See more: Movies


Be the first to leave a comment →
Posted on March 23, 2009

Movies »Watchmen

watchmen poster
It's hard for me to imagine what seeing the new Watchmen movie might be like for someone who's unfamiliar with beardo Alan Moore's celebrated, world-changing comic book. As he's said himself, Watchmen was never intended to be adapted for the screen; the structure is just so Byzantine and there's so much alternate reality era-hopping action and dense supplementary material that, as my mom said (who saw the movie without having read the book), the experience can be very, very overwhelming. But for those of us who have read it, the film works as sort of an accompaniment, an abbreviated reminder of why we liked the graphic novel so much in the first place.

Watching the film un-spool, those of use who love the book can only base the success of the movie upon a mental check list of what they got right (keeping Dr. Manhattan nude, for one), what they got wrong (the miscast Malin Ackerman sounding like a ditz), what they kept (to my shock, the Comedian's heinous act in a bar at the close of the Vietnam war), and what they omitted (the octopus thing – which I actually think is okay). It's impossible to separate the movie from the source material, but I've come to the conclusion that they pretty much did the best they could within the confines of a three hour, mega-budget studio movie – particularly when you consider that previous productions (which nearly got off the ground) intended to move the story to the present day and replace the Cold War backdrop with George W. Bush era terrorism.

As you might have read, the adaptation that finally made it to the screen is extremely loyal to the comic. The opening credit sequence is a fantastic montage of an alternate history that fills in some of the back story for the uninitiated, setting up the Minutemen and imagining an America where costumed adventurers really do exist, but are as flawed – if not more so – than the rest of us; a central theme made abundantly clear as the film plays on.

Next comes the first of many literally hard hitting fight scenes between a mysterious dark figure and the now grizzled Comedian (who is played to perfection by Jeffrey Dean Morgan). Other commendable casting choices include, surprisingly, Billy Crudup as Dr. Manhattan, an actor who I've only found believable as a god-like unfeeling naked blue phenomenon and the voice of credit cards.

Patrick Wilson is fine as Nite Owl, though still not as middle-aged and soft as I imagined; Carla Gugino is great as a former pin up/crime fighter who eats up her hard boiled lines like a pro. But it's Bad News Bear Jackie Earle Haley who stands out the most, delivering spectacularly creepy gravel-voiced monologues (“Beneath me, this awful city, it screams like an abattoir full of retarded children. New York… The dusk reeks of fornication and bad consciences”) that put Christian Bale's Batman to shame. His freckled cheeks shake with anger and insanity and he gets all the good lines. When Rorschach's on screen, the movie is at its best: pure, albeit graphically violent, cinematic fun – or at least as fun as a movie that's message is that humans are destined to slaughter themselves and the only way to temporarily halt the self destruction is through deceptively crafted holocausts can be.

On the opposite end of the acting spectrum, every time Malin Ackerman was on screen, I cringed. She delivers her lines as if she has no idea what the words mean, and while she's a dead ringer for Laurie Jupiter in that wig (minus about fifteen years) she lacks the grit. We're denied the chain smoking, faded ex-crime fighter wryly working her way out of a stale long-term relationship and instead presented with someone who'd make an unconvincing entrainment news correspondent. And she doesn't even smoke those crazy cigarettes! The producers managed to keep in shots of penises, major full frontal sex scenes, a man's arms sawn off by a power tool, and an insane skull-shattering cleaver attack — but don't worry all you morons who took your little kids (and believe me there were tons of 2 to 11 year olds in the audience with us), while your impressionable offspring will go home with fodder for years of nightmares and lingering, soul destroying questions ('Who is Richard Nixon?' being the least of them), at least they won't think that women smoking cigarettes are glamorous.

In the end, I have the same issues with the film that I did the book; I never cared for the Mars scenes -– maybe just because I couldn't get my head around that crazy clock-like flying spiked palace thing, and the ending relies too much on exposition to whittle down the sprawling plot that it's just a bit of a let down. At the same time, I'm impressed they kept the ending (which is a downer, to say the least) intact. Heroes are supposed to save humanity, but here they act as self righteous mass murders (or complicit impotents) enacting some kind of cynical social engineering conceived to save us from ourselves. I thought it was surely too bleak a message to put on the silver screen, but there it was.

People were gearing up to dislike this movie from the get go, critics either hate it because it's too close to the book or balk that it's not faithful enough. Personally, I was pretty impressed and although the book could only properly be adapted in the form of a British mini-series made in the 90s (I'm referencing you, Neverwhere), for a big Hollywood movie, this is as close as we're going to get?Alan Moore, forgive me.

See more: Movies


Be the first to leave a comment →
Posted on March 16, 2009

Movies »Aguirre – The Wrath of God

aguirre the wrath of godWerner Herzog is a filmmaker who works on a grande scale. You can watch Jim's favorite documentary, Burden of Dreams to see what I mean, or just take the opening sequence of Aguirre: The Wrath of God. Working with the inherent drama of extreme natural environments to create awe inspiring images that must be demanding on all involved is Herzog's greatest feat and the film opens up with series of long shots tracking a party of conquistadors clad in heavy armor winding their way down a steep and majestic mountain path hauling massive canons and reluctant animals while slaves cautiously maneuver noble ladies in sedan chairs.

After the descent, it becomes clear to all involved that the journey towards the fabled city of El Dorado is not going well so forty particularly handy men are sent down-river to find food or information about the city's whereabouts, both of which, the mission commander explains with full confidence, are near at hand. A nobleman called Pedro de Ursua is chosen as the leader of this expedition and the crazed Aguirre is placed second in charge; against the commander's better judgement two women, Ursua's wife and Aguirre's daughter, will join them. Most amazingly, the commander's decision to create the scouting party is ratified through a crazily bureaucratic series of signatures and seals, a testament to the deluded Spaniards' mental state.

A classic piece of man versus nature (for all you high school English teachers out there) ensues and Herzog's favorite twin motifs, the callousness of nature and the cruelty man, become evident fast; to call the expedition a catastrophe might even be an understatement. The men are in a struggle to conquer. Not only in a traditional sense but through their strange insistence on paperwork, titles, and legal proceeding that carry no real meaning in the deepest, darkest jungles of Peru. Between the rapids, dangerous indigenous tribesmen, and hunger, an anarchic coup led by a maniac is just another hardship.

Klaus Kinski, in the first of several collaborations with the director, does what he was born to do: embodying a deluded and aggressive mad man more convincingly than any other screen actor ever has. Nothing however, even Kinski's crazy eyed performance is unrealistically over the top, this is a subtle and almost detached film with minimal dialogue that works wonderfully as a realistic portrayal of incidents that, though imagined, are the kind often only found in the dry pages of history books. Herzog makes the past feel genuinely alive, as if we're experiencing the events first hand. Water droplets are left on the lens and actors even stare at times directly into the camera as if they are looking at you.

The soundtrack, by Krautrock band Popol Vul, is effective and the costumes are fantastic. Designers could dive into the studding, high lace collars and the exquisite use of purple in the conquistadors' shirts and literally build an entire collection around them. Like all of Herzog's work, the film is visually arresting, and the final scene with the monkeys on the raft is particularly haunting.

Considered one of the best art films ever made, this masterpiece earned a cult following and a respected reputation upon its premiere. Jim's been intrigued since a very young age when he read a plot summary in a Leonard Maltin encyclopedia that told of a conquistador who, searching for El Dorado, instead decides to steal the entire continent – it was a concept that blew him away.

See more: Movies


Be the first to leave a comment →
Posted on March 9, 2009

Movies »Moliere

moliereMoli?re is a light and fluffy romantic comedy set in late 1600s France that my parents recently recommended. Much like Shakespeare in Love, which it resembles in many ways (though without the international audience), this is a fictitious account of a famous playwright inspired by true love and bittersweet obstacles to become the “the creator of modern French comedy.”

The very handsome Romain Duris plays Moli?re with a mustache and long hair that are hard for me to resist (as you may recall, Justin Theroux sports a similar look as Jesus in The Ten) and the Italian actress Laura Morante is equally attractive as Elmire, the playwright's muse and the wife of a bumbling merchant who is obsessed with Swimming Pool star Ludivine Sagnier. The sets and costumes are predictably lush and vibrant and the plot hinges on amusing twists and turns while the romance is neatly ensconced in farce.

Fans and scholars of Moli?re's work will undoubtedly get a kick out of all the references to the great author's plays that went right over my head, but the film works perfectly fine as a light and airy diversion for those of us less familiar with 17th Century French Lit, and it's absolutely perfect for day-dreamy afternoon romance.

See more: Movies


Be the first to leave a comment →
Posted on March 2, 2009